Warning Signs
For fiscal years spanning
2000-2001 to 2007-2008
Failed to
develop land
within five
Spent more
than half their
money on
Spent at least
$100,000 of budget and built no units



in Poverty:


Source: Census 2000

Contact this agency:


1735 Montgomery St.

Oroville, CA 95965

Source: California Redevelopment Association

Website as of 2010; Address as of 2008

Jump to: Housing Units | Land Holdings | Spending | Nearby Agencies

Housing Units (back to top)

  • 71 used covenants
  • 52 used subsidies
  • 0 used funds allocated for mobile homes
  • 11 built
  • 42 rehabilitated
  • 0 destroyed

Land Holdings (back to top)

A state law requires land purchased for affordable housing to be developed within five years.

This agency has failed to develop:

  • 0 parcels of land for more than five years
  • 0 parcels of land for more than 10 years

Spending (back to top)

Expenditure data current as of 2008.


Percent of Total

Agency Average

At risk of becoming
$0 0% 4.76%
Debt payments $0 0% 28.33%
Land acquisition
and site preparation
$1,559,017 10.21% 20.70%
Mobile homes $0 0% 4.79%
New $3,042,410 19.93% 19.18%
Other $1,175,252 7.70% 16.61%
Planning and
$2,764,752 18.11% 23.57%
$1,689,674 11.07% 13.02%
Rental subsidies $5,033,014 32.97% 19.33%
Total $15,264,119 100% N/A

Nearby Agencies (back to top)

Click for more information:

Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development

Credits: Kim Christensen, Jessica Garrison, Michelle Minkoff, Sandra Poindexter, Doug Smith

Select an agency:
About this project

This database tracks the expenditures of California city and county redevelopment agencies on housing.

During the fiscal years spanning 2000-2001 to 2007-2008, agencies spent property tax dollars mostly on planning, acquiring land and constructing, renovating and removing housing units.

Arrested Redevelopment

Follow The Times’ two-part investigation:

About the Data Desk

This page was created by the Data Desk, a team of reporters and Web developers at The Times.